Court Approves Ador Request: Min Hee-jin, Danielle’s Family Assets Frozen

In a significant development for the ongoing legal saga involving K-pop agency Ador, a Seoul court in February approved the company’s request to provisionally freeze assets belonging to former NewJeans member Danielle’s mother and Ador’s former CEO, Min Hee-jin. This ruling, reported Wednesday by local legal sources, intensifies the high-stakes dispute.

The provisional seizure targets a substantial 7 billion won (approximately $4.73 million), with 5 billion won claimed against Min Hee-jin and 2 billion won against Danielle’s mother. This critical legal action aims to prevent the defendants from disposing of or concealing assets, thereby securing the enforceability of any potential compensation awarded to Ador following a final court judgment.

This asset freeze follows Ador’s comprehensive 43 billion won damages lawsuit, initiated on December 29, against Danielle, her mother, and Min Hee-jin. The K-pop agency subsequently pursued the provisional seizure in January specifically against Min Hee-jin and Danielle’s mother, opting to exclude Danielle herself from this particular measure.

The genesis of this complex legal battle dates back to November 2024, when the group announced the termination of their exclusive contracts, citing alleged breaches by Ador. However, subsequent court rulings have consistently favored Ador, affirming the validity of the original artist contracts. Following these decisions, NewJeans members Hyein, Haerin, and Hanni have rejoined the agency, while Minji’s return remains under negotiation. Notably, Danielle’s contract with Ador has been officially terminated.

Tensions significantly escalated during the initial preparatory hearing on March 26, as both legal teams vehemently clashed over the proceedings’ timeline. Ador requested a two-month trial delay, arguing for its necessity to resolve a separate, concurrent put-option lawsuit involving Min Hee-jin and Ador’s parent company, Hybe.

Danielle’s legal representatives strongly opposed the postponement, asserting that Ador appeared to be intentionally prolonging the case, a move they claimed could severely impede her burgeoning solo career. Ador, conversely, vehemently denied any deliberate attempt to delay, emphasizing the complex legal intricacies involved that necessitate thorough review.

Ultimately, the court rejected Ador’s request for a postponement, instead scheduling subsequent hearings for May 14 and July 2. The judiciary also actively encouraged both parties to pursue a potential settlement, aiming to resolve the dispute outside of protracted litigation.

Further complicating these already intricate proceedings, a significant development occurred on April 24: five attorneys from the prestigious law firm Kim & Chang, who had been representing Ador in the damages case, tendered their resignations en masse. This unexpected exodus has fueled widespread speculation regarding potential further delays in the legal process.

Ador is reportedly in the process of appointing new legal representation to navigate the complexities of this ongoing dispute.

jaaykim